Why fund managers say the market may be overreacting to Equity Trustees' ASIC case
A civil case over the Shield and First Guardian fund collapses has weighed on the stock, but several managers see the sell-off as larger than the likely financial impact.
13 Jul 2026 · 5 min read

In short
ASIC commenced civil proceedings against Equity Trustees' subsidiary in September 2025 over its role as trustee of the collapsed Shield and First Guardian Master Funds.
Investors Mutual Limited estimates the stock has lost $600-800 million in market capitalisation against a potential impact it puts at only $100-200 million.
Oracle Advisory Group has been reducing its holding, viewing the dispute as a drawn-out legal battle better watched from the sidelines.
Fund managers are split on whether Equity Trustees has been unfairly punished by the market. Investors Mutual Limited argued in a July 2026 Interview that the stock had given up something like $600 million to $800 million of market capitalisation for a matter that might only carry $100 million to $200 million of potential impact, calling it a case of the market overreacting to a short-term regulatory issue.
An ASIC case that has run for almost a year
The saga began in September 2025, when ASIC commenced civil penalty proceedings against Equity Trustees' subsidiary over its trusteeship of the collapsed Shield and First Guardian Master Funds. Ellerston Capital described the allegation at the time as centred on a failure of due diligence obligations, while noting the company intended to vigorously defend the claims. Asymmetric Asset Management has been one of the more active traders of the position, trimming and adding as new information emerged, and used its May 2026 Monthly Report to say it was surprised by the market's reaction given the exposure to First Guardian had been well documented for months.
We believe EQT possesses a hard-to-replicate business model which is high quality and importantly we view the current share price as being discounted significantly more than the potential liabilities should ASIC be successful in their claims.
— Asymmetric Asset Management, Monthly Report, May 2026
Not every manager shares that conviction. Oracle Advisory Group used its March 2026 Quarterly Report to explain it had been reducing its holding for several months, noting the company continued to deny liability while the dispute looked set to become a drawn-out legal battle it was happy to watch from the sidelines rather than hold through. Investors Mutual Limited's June 2026 Quarterly Report struck a middle ground, arguing the ongoing press coverage had hit the share price without a material impact on the underlying business's profitability.
What managers are watching next
With the case yet to be resolved in the Federal Court, most managers who remain invested are framing the position around the gap between Equity Trustees' recurring trustee revenue and the market's pricing of legal tail risk. Investors Mutual's July 2026 view was that the stock trades on about ten times earnings for what it called a predictable, low-volatility, highly recurring and cash-generative business on a fully franked yield of about 6.5%, with the regulatory overhang the main variable left to resolve.
Questions
Why has ASIC taken action against Equity Trustees?
ASIC commenced civil penalty proceedings against Equity Trustees' subsidiary, EQT Superannuation Limited, alleging it failed in its due diligence obligations as trustee of the collapsed Shield and First Guardian Master Funds.
Do fund managers think Equity Trustees' share price fall is justified?
Views differ. Investors Mutual Limited and Asymmetric Asset Management argue the share price fall has significantly exceeded the likely financial impact of the case, while Oracle Advisory Group has reduced its holding given the uncertainty of a drawn-out legal process.
What is Equity Trustees' core business outside the ASIC case?
Fund managers describe Equity Trustees as a predictable, recurring-revenue trustee and corporate services business with strong operating leverage, trading on a fully franked dividend yield that managers such as Investors Mutual Limited view as attractive.
7 managers, 23 comments, with each manager's latest recorded position.
See EQT